There are developers who may want to make minor updates to the docs instead of filing an issue with a tech writer.Taking turns to edit the same file is not an option – and here is where conflict resolution and merge tools come to the rescue. In our case, this involves a dozen different authors and often happens a few days before the release. Such content is the responsibility of the team of IntelliJ IDEA technical writers, and once it’s finalized, an automatic workflow creates issues for the writers responsible for other JetBrains IDEs who then customize and adjust it for their products. This happens because we have a dozen products based on the same platform, and any documentation covering language-agnostic features of an IDE, such as editor features, version control, and general settings, would be reused. We have many sections in our docs that are shared between multiple publications.Even if there are several writers on a team each responsible for an isolated product area, they would all still add new topics, move content around, and remove obsolete topics, resulting in changes to the same configuration file. Apart from actual content files, a project may contain a bunch of configuration files, for example, a file that defines a table of contents.Areas of responsibility aren’t clearly defined.Īlthough this may indeed be a sign that you should revisit your content organization and roles, I could easily provide a few examples when such collaboration is justified.A solution would be to break it up into several smaller articles. The document is too long as it describes several features owned by different writers. ![]() ![]() Some writers believe that multiple people having to contribute to the same file may signify the following problems: Many questioned the described workflow and highlighted that having to collaborate on the same file, pull and rebase changes daily, and resolve conflicts may be a sign of organizational and content management issues. Other developers are likely to be looking at your commits, which means that those changes are on a public branch, even if they're not on the master branch.Our first blog post on Git sparked discussions among different communities of tech writers. Or at least, don't use rebase after creating the pull request. Likewise, if pull requests form part of your code reviews, don't use rebase. If your project has multiple contributors, the safe thing to do is only use rebase on your local repository, and not on public branches. Your changes to your repository are going to cause problems to a lot of people when you push your rebased code to your remote repository. That would restore your master branch, albeit with an odd-looking history.ĭon't use rebase on shared branches where others are likely to work. To get your master branch back, you'd need to rebase again, this time from your new-feature branch to your master branch. You could still rebase in the wrong direction for example, and rebase your master branch onto your new-feature branch. If you're the only developer using a repository, there's less chance of you doing something with rebase that is disastrous. This stops the work done in branches from messing up the master branch, and it allows simultaneous development to happen in different parts of the code base. Development, such as new features, takes place in segregated side branches. This is where the project's code base sits. ![]() A project repository will have a main or master branch. Branches are a fundamental part of version control systems. In particular, working with branches had to be as fast as possible. One of Git's main design decisions was speed. Today Git is used globally, with a massive 98 percent of 71 thousand respondents in a 2022 survey using Git as the version control system. Sites like GitHub, GitLab, and BitBucket have symbiotically promoted and benefited from Git. The Git Explosionįrustrated with other version control systems and their slow updates and commits, Linus Torvalds, of Linux kernel fame, put aside a month in 2005 to write his own. ![]() We explain what rebase does, how it's used, and when to use merge instead. The Git rebase command combines two source code branches into one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |